« International Commercial Space Development for the Future 50 Years | Main | »

March 14, 2007


Joseph Hiddink

The power/propulsion system as used by the Flying Saucer, which I discovered and patented is the only way we can have real space travel. Of course Nasa Propulsion Engineers do not like it. They would be obsolete if we can fly to the Moon in one hour or Mars in a day, no matter where they are located at the time.
All that without barfbags and osteoporosis.
The system of free energy that a Flying Saucer uses can also be applied to free energy like Tesla used for his electric Pierce-Arrow car in 1931. It can also be used to give homes free power, non-polluting. Other applications are e.g. Floating or Flying Cars, Electric Aicraft of the VTOL type. Offered to Canada as a Birthday Present in 1967, it was soundly rebuked and ridiculed by the Canadian National Research Council, the Scientific Arm of the Canadian Government, up to four months after patents were granted. Then, as they realized that they had "lost face", they decided to keep on denying and poohooing the invention. They did and do.
I offered one application to the Penny-wise USA DOD but they refused to pay me my fee when they waited till the patent had lapsed.
For only one Billion (that is just the cost of a few rocket-engines) I could build a spacecraft as big as a footballfield, crewed with a company like we have in a Naval Cruiser. Since the US Navy and USMC were not interested, maybe the Army or Air Force has some people with money and brains.

Rich Scales

Ok Mr Hiddink, now go fry your brains in jello you retard

The way forward is to have a president with the commitment of kennedy.

However I do not believe for one moment the space program is standing still. Ive just got back from a trip to kennedy space ceter, saw up close various sections built from various nations for the ISS, and it is truly amazing.

the inventor

Interstellar Propulsion Possible

NASA wont return or even carry a first conversation because this technology threatens their agency.

Is this what we want of our national space research agency ?

How many good intentioned inventions have we NOT heard about or even considered by this EGO driven agency ?

Here's one.


Considering man's discovery of Earth like planet I think the urgency has accelerated.

Because this technology has national security issues for the USA in must be kept secret.


i think your so rond about this. technology will not be anything like you say in the next 50 years!!!!!!!!!!!


i think your so rond about this. technology will not be anything like you say in the next 50 years!!!!!!!!!!!


how long is this??!!
I was bored by the first sentence


how long is this??!!
I was bored by the first sentence

Göran Askeljung

>>How to reduce CO² emission<<

At the present rate of world-wide population growth rate and the growing industrialization of China and the third world, we are definitely running into problems with the environment. But what if there were less people around to consume and more forest to handle the CO² emissions?

Be fruitful and multiply; and fill the earth (Gen 1:28) God commands Adam and Eve, which they made a good start of; but then something went terribly wrong. The world today is not in good stewardship, as God wanted from us. Our false God – Consumption – is driving us in a wholly different direction.
For a long time perspective on CO² reduction to work, we either need to reverse industrialization (not going to happen) or reduce consumption (also not going to happen) or take the variable out of the equation totally: People!

Have you ever thought about that, even for just one second? I’m not proclaiming genocide here – God forbid – no; I only want to tease a creative idea I think is worth having a closer look at.

Consumption is the root cause of CO² emissions and people is the root cause of consumption. It’s that simple. So how do we significantly reduce the world population?

Genocide is not an option, so we need to entice people to leave the planet, i.e. invest is space exploitation! Yes, exploitation. If people had an attractive alternative, they will always go there. So we have to create a new Klondike, a new gold rush where people will go to make their dreams come true. Today, that is over the border from Zimbabwe to South Africa, or from Africa to Europe, etc. Tomorrow – in a few years – that can be Space instead. Thus it has to be space exploitation and not just exploration; otherwise the masses won’t be enticed to go there. If there’s not a buck to make, then no one’s interested!

How do we make this happen? If the world’s governments are serious about CO² reduction and all of them put trading of emission certificates in place, we would have a source for financing the initial endeavors’ into space. This could be a source of funding for NASA and other national space programs but also for ESA and other international agencies, seeking to develop the technologies needed to make space travel and exploitation possible. Furthermore, there should be government funding and tax reductions made effective for any commercial developments that seems viable to this end.

But will not space travel be a burden to the environment? Yes, initially and today, this is true. We do not need to look far ahead though, to see new technologies made available to seriously reduce any impact on CO² emissions to this end. In Science Fiction, the possibilities of Plasma Engines and Space Elevators have been debated for years. In material research, we already have promising technologies today, which on a massive scale could support this very cause.

So where will people go? A few scenarios: Terra forming of Mars, commercial exploitation of the Moon and the Asteroids and even the Leisure Industry would create massive opportunities for people to get involved in. If I could go on hols’ to the Moon in 25 years, I’d save a while for the ticket (but only if Paris Hilton isn’t!). The pioneers of modern Space travel, like Sir Richard Branson shows the way. Given a massive support from a financial perspective and the opportunity to “play it for keeps” when it comes to the fruits of space exploitation, I think we should seriously think about this long-term perspective for saving out precious planet.

By Göran Askeljung


Mr. Askeljung is a Guru in "GTD Methodology":http://www.immediate-effects.com/Training_BusiSim.aspx?language=eng, Director of "immediate effects":http://www.immediate-effects.com/AboutUs.aspx?language=eng and Board Member of "eBlizz, Inc. ":http://www.eblizz.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=101&Itemid=108 His private passion has always been Space Exploitation and Evangelism.

wow gold

yo nice!thanks for your sharing sir!
i will give u some useful websites.
http://www.buywowgold.org.cn wow gold|buy wow gold
http://www.buy-wow-gold.org.cn wow gold|buy wow gold

=] woop

woopwoop =] haha


Nice topic!
SALE!!! Buy cheap pharmacy online / Online Drugstore/ Cheap pharmacyes!
Nice topic!
SALE!!! Buy cheap pharmacy online / Online Drugstore/ Cheap pharmacyes!


Only we have the best Viagra in our online pharmacy!http://kerneltrap.org/user/17238 Buy cialis
http://kerneltrap.org/user/17254 Generic cialis prices
http://kerneltrap.org/user/17255 Buy cialis online
http://kerneltrap.org/user/17256 Buy cheap cialis
http://kerneltrap.org/user/17257 Buy discount cialis
http://kerneltrap.org/user/17260 Buy soma online
http://kerneltrap.org/user/17261 Online soma
http://kerneltrap.org/user/17262 Cheap soma
http://kerneltrap.org/user/17263 Order soma
http://kerneltrap.org/user/17264 Buy viagra
http://kerneltrap.org/user/17265 Generic viagra
http://kerneltrap.org/user/17266 Cheap viagra
http://kerneltrap.org/user/17267 Viagra discount


[url= http://ryno.krovatka.su ]сиськи[/url]


http://www.laflash.org/forum/member.php?u=3926 buy cialis
http://www.laflash.org/forum/member.php?u=3927 Generic cialis
http://www.laflash.org/forum/member.php?u=3928 Buy Cheap Cialis
http://www.laflash.org/forum/member.php?u=3929 discount cialis
http://www.laflash.org/forum/member.php?u=3930 ORDER CIALIS
http://www.laflash.org/forum/member.php?u=3933 Buy Soma Online
http://www.laflash.org/forum/member.php?u=3935 Cheap Soma
http://www.laflash.org/forum/member.php?u=3936 ORDER SOMA
http://www.laflash.org/forum/member.php?u=3937 generic soma
http://www.laflash.org/forum/member.php?u=3938 Buy Viagra ONLINE
http://www.laflash.org/forum/member.php?u=3939 ORDER VIAGRA
http://www.laflash.org/forum/member.php?u=3940 Buy viagra online
http://www.laflash.org/forum/member.php?u=3941 cheap viagra
http://www.laflash.org/forum/member.php?u=3942 Discount Viagra
http://scootgame.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=143 Buy Viagra
http://scootgame.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=144 Generic VIAGRA
http://scootgame.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=145 Buy viagra online
http://scootgame.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=146 Cheap Viagra
http://scootgame.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=147 Discount VIAGRA
http://scootgame.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=148 Order viagra
http://scootgame.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=149 BUY CIALIS ONLINE
http://scootgame.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=150 Generic cialis online!
http://scootgame.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=151 Buy cheap Cialis


http://www.sustainablebuildingcentre.com/event/generic_cialis_buy_cheap_cialis_online Generic Cialis - Buy Cheap Cialis Online
http://www.sustainablebuildingcentre.com/event/buy_cialis_online_cialis_at_low_prices Buy Cialis Online - Cialis at low prices
http://www.sustainablebuildingcentre.com/event/cheap_cialis_cialis_at_low_prices CheapCialis-Cialis at low prices
http://www.sustainablebuildingcentre.com/event/buy_viagra_online_viagra_at_low_prices Buy viagra online - Viagra at low prices
http://www.sustainablebuildingcentre.com/event/cheap_viagra_buy_viagra_online Cheap Viagra - Buy Viagra Online


http://forum.springframework.org/member.php?u=33970 Order Topamax
http://forum.springframework.org/member.php?u=33970 Buy Topamax online


Two astronauts from the US shuttle Endeavour successfully completed a fifth and

final spacewalk of their mission late Saturday, stepping into the void to attach a

50-foot sensory boom to the outside of the International Space Station.
Please Visit For More Detail





Michael J. Coppi

Man on Mars by 2019 using 3 Shuttles
To Reduce Program Costs
Before planned 2011 Retiring of the STS Fleet

Send 3 Shuttles to Mars
......by Michael J. Coppi, X711mjc@cs.com, 01/05/09

As a former Aerospace Engineer with the Space Transportation System, I envision that the U.S. can complete a manned Mars mission (landing/return) within ten years. Such could also be accomplished on a much lower budget (in relation to a 100% newly designed program), by using existing hardware (the 3 Space Shuttles as primary components [+ some new equipment]) and including backup systems to ensure mission success.

Here's an outline -- naturally there are details to work out, but this mission SHOULD BE viable [Orbiter Names are used arbitrarily].............


A. Discovery to Mars - Atmospheric Penetration, Landing, Return-to-Orbit Module

B. Atlantis to Mars Orbit - Docks with + Returns Excursion Crew to Earth

C. Endeavour Accompanies as Contingency Rescue - Backup of All Elements


i). Launch into low earth orbit an unmanned vehicle carrying a spaceworthy 'CANister' [CAN] - supply of food/water/oxygen to support 3 astronauts during journey to Mars.

ii). Launch into low earth orbit an unmanned vehicle carrying a Booster Rocket Motor [BRM] for propulsion to Mars.

'CAN' and 'BRM' are 'parked' together, possibly [preferably] docked-with/tethered-to International Space Station [ISS]. See below [note c] for alternative to BRM.

1). Launch 'Discovery' from KSC pad 39A - in the cargo bay is an MEM [Mars Exit Module - designed to carry crew from Mars surface to Mars orbit upon completion of surface exploration].

MEM/Additional crew could also be pre-launched/picked-up at ISS.

2). Discovery picks up CAN/BRM/MEM/Crew as necessary. MEM must go in cargo bay, 'CAN' is attached via a hatch/airlock for access en-route [nominal length of trip to Mars = 9 months]. 'BRM' is 'strapped on' for boost to Mars + course corrections and insertion into Mars orbit.

Discovery makes a one-way trip to Mars (to be immediately followed by Atlantis for crew return - see below), where it will serve as lander (or introduction into Martian atmosphere of lander) - see further below.

3). Atlantis is launched. Minimal [2] crew. Payload [food/water/oxygen for crew of 2 to Mars + return of 5 astronauts] is pre-stowed in cargo bay and/or picked up in orbit like Discovery's 'CAN'. Also picks up a pre-launched 'BRM' [double capacity BRM = fuel to/from Mars].
Atlantis is the 'return from Mars' vehicle. Launched within days/weeks of Discovery from KSC pad 39B. Atlantis follows Discovery to Mars to receive MEM/crew upon return from Martian surface.

4). Discovery arrives/orbits Mars, jettisons CAN & BRM. Fires existing onboard OMS [Orbital Maneuvering System] pods and enters Martian atmosphere, positioned to land at smoothest possible locale.
Landing will be rough but upright and survivable. Perhaps oversized tires on retrofitted landing gear [perhaps even skis]. Early deployment of drag chute could possibly compensate for thin Martian atmosphere. See alternate landing scenario further below (MEM ejected as independent soft lander).

5). After 2-week [+/-] excursion, MEM launches directly from cargo bay, docks with Atlantis in Mars orbit (jettison after crew/sample transfer or stow in cargo bay). Utilize Atlantis' double-capacity CAN & BRM for return to Earth, de-orbit as usual, land at KSC or Edwards AFB.

6). Endeavour has been launched within a month of Discovery, and [with its own CAN/BRM/MEM + minimal crew] has followed Atlantis to serve as backup/rescue. (If unused, it can be possibly be fitted for a later Moon Sample Return Mission [MSRM]).

Why relegate retired Space Shuttles to eternity in a museum? The 3 Orbiters can be modified to serve as the backbone of a manned explorative journey of Mars - an STS Finale. Enterprise is already at the Smithsonian, the remainder of the fleet is spaceworthy, and that's exactly where the shuttles should spend their final days: IN SPACE.

by Michael J. Coppi, X711mjc@cs.com, 01/05/09


a). Could be accomplished with two Shuttles [2 journey, 1 lands, 1 returns], or three [3rd as backup/rescue Mars Lander w/MEM]. Both [or all three] Orbiters coupled together in "train" configuration with powering Shuttle at rear would eliminate need for separate BRMs and Cans, plus consolidate interplanetary travel.

b). The biggest argument might be concern over Discovery's Mars landing in thin atmosphere and on uncleared ground. Prior reconnaissance can easily choose a relatively barren area with just small rocks. Possibly even "ski"-type landing gear (deployed with explosive charges) instead of wheels. Recall that landing is one-time only.
Alternately, landing crew transfers to MEM, MEM ejects from Discovery within Martian atmosphere, MEM parachutes and/or retrofires to independent soft landing, Discovery impacts unmaaned, acts as 'seeder' per addendum [further below].

c). Perhaps a Mini External Tank [MET] as 'payload' in cargo bay of Discovery upon launch from Earth. Removed from bay in earth orbit [replaced with pre-launched MEM] and attached to the Mars-bound Shuttle [similarly to ET]. Main engines would then be available [greater thrust, throttleable and re-fireable for corrections and orbit insertion]. 'MET' option would remain in Cargo Bay of Atlantis with direct feed line to Main Engines.

Copyright © 2009, Michael J. Coppi,
X711mjc@cs.com, 909-370-3723

From a concept originally proposed 3/15/2005 by Michael J. Coppi
163 W. La Sierra Dr.; Arcadia, CA 91007 626-447-9102

Q & A

I remain adament that this project is feasible and needs to be pursued. Concerns [such as below] are anticipated - the general answer being that any obstacles CAN be overcome. The main thing is that 70% of the equipment needed for a manned mission to Mars ALREADY EXISTS. The opportunity to utilize these resources [Shuttles + STS Launch Capability] should not be forsaken.

I urge promotion of an agenda that incorporates Space Shuttles as the primary component of a manned Mars program. I contend that such a paradigm shift is necessary to achieve this goal.

Addressing particlar queries --

Mass in LEO [Low Earth Orbit]... booster rocket motor component would have to be very large.... [plus extra] propellant to prevent boil-off. This is an Aries V-class payload.
Entry speeds... entering the atmosphere from hyperbolic speeds... [shuttles' tiles] could not take the additional heat load.
Shuttles landing on Mars... at 100,000 feet (the place where Earth's atmosphere is as thin as it is on Mars' surface), the shuttle is going much faster. Landing would be difficult, and deploying the drag chute would not help.
Power... fuel cells... deployable solar power system... batteries.
Timeline Cost/Manpower... space shuttle [operations] costs $3B/year... not be able to 'switch' to development

All the more reason to GO with this program NOW, and especially before the ops force dissipates and/or systems capability is modified [Orion] or lost completely [SRB construction, ET construction, etc.]. New engineering must be contracted.

- Mike Coppi, BSAE, Cal Poly Pomona, 1982
Addendum --

Seed Mars Now!

.........by Michael J. Coppi, X711mjc@cs.com, 01/05/09

We must begin now to prepare Mars for future colonization by Humans.

The 'search for life' program is now anticlimactic at best, moot at worst. It almost seems a waste to keep sending sterile launders. In fact the uncertainty that all landers have been 100% sterile puts in question the source of any "life" ever found. Remember too that meteorites from Earth may have already seeded Mars in the distant or recent past..

Future probes should be deliberately "contaminated" with any and all organisms that have the slightest chance of surviving and taking root in the Martian environment.

Life forms accustomed to Arctic/Antarctic locales are obvious prime choices.

The simplest method of delivery would be to shield the probe for entry into the Martian atmosphere, then allow it to crash to the surface.

More sophisticated soft landers could even provide nourishment and/or shelter for moss, grass, microbes, even insects.

There's certainly CO2 in the atmosphere to possibly support some hardy polar algae, moss or plant from Earth that can survive with just the moisture from ice that's been found just beneath the Martian surface. Eventually leading to simple grasses. More plants = O2 added to atmosphere for eventual animal life.

Terra-Forming efforts must start now!

by Michael J. Coppi, X711mjc@cs.com, 01/05/09
800 E. Washington St. #833
Colton, CA 92324



What the future saves for us, is impossible to know. What we do know is that space exploration meant a major turning point in our history and that it will continue to revolutionate the way we think and see things, from now on as well.

buy viagra

Space exploration is the use of astronomy and space technology to explore outer space.[1] Physical exploration of space is conducted both by human spaceflights and by robotic spacecraft. While the observation of objects in space, known as astronomy, predates reliable recorded history, it was the development of large liquid-fueled rocket engines during the early 20th century that allowed physical space exploration to become a reality. Common rationales for exploring space include advancing scientific research, uniting different nations, ensuring the future survival of humanity and developing military and strategic advantages against other countries. Various criticisms of space exploration are sometimes made, generally on cost or safety grounds.

Space exploration has often been used as a proxy competition for geopolitical rivalries such as the Cold War. The early era of space exploration was driven by a "Space Race" between the Soviet Union and the United States; the launch of the first man-made object to orbit the Earth, the USSR's Sputnik 1, on October 4, 1957, and the first Moon landing by the American Apollo 11 craft on July 20, 1969 are often taken as the boundaries for this initial period. The Soviet space program achieved many of the first milestones, including the first living being in orbit in 1957, the first human spaceflight (Yuri Gagarin aboard Vostok 1) in 1961, the first spacewalk (by Aleksei Leonov) in 1965, the first automatic landing on another celestial body in 1966, and the launch of the first space station (Salyut 1) in 1971.

After the first 20 years of exploration, focus shifted from one-off flights to renewable hardware, such as the Space Shuttle program, and from competition to cooperation as with the International Space Station.


I chuckled at Dr. Griffin's optimism that the US will remain the leader in space exploration for the coming decades and thought it misplaced. Then I saw the article was dated 2007, just before Lehman, BearStearns, WaMu, and others bit the dust. What a difference 3 years and a financial collapse make! Dr. Griffin was right: future forecasting is indeed difficult stuff. Who would have thunk Wall Street would take America out of the new space race before it even started.
I hope Dr. Griffin will update his predictions contained this article, taking into consideration our national bankruptcy and other trends of the past three years. I wonder if Dr. Griffin will recommend that NASA apply for funding directly from the People's Bank of China, and if so, what collaterals can we put up? Wait, I think I know! Let's offer the Chinese our extremely expensive, practically useless, but nonetheless ultra cool (in a 1980s' sort of way) Space Shuttles!

Nike Shox Turbo

If it is a scenery, I appreciate! If communication is a kind of friendship, I desire! If the friend is a kind of heart, I treasure! Once I met, destined to chance! A visit to life, friendship! A blessing, with all sincerity!

air jordan 1

How nice to get information from you! I just respond to inform you all the things are wonderful on you page. Thanks a lot!

The comments to this entry are closed.

On Space Contributors