Fifty Years On: The Future of Space Exploration
By G. Scott Hubbard
Forecasting the future is both fun and hazardous. Pity the ancient soothsayer whose reading of bird entrails was at odds with a monarch’s agenda. In more modern times civilization has been entertained by 150 years of speculative fiction, some of which was amazingly prescient. I hope to be in the latter class here.
Ordinarily, science fiction writers and futurists point to a new technology or scientific discovery that is the vehicle for envisioning “things to come.” While I will develop a few of those same themes, my principal prediction is that human beings will change in some fundamental ways that will both enable and react to space exploration.
Some of this change will be attitudinal. We will invest heavily in stewardship of this planet as climate changes. We will use both in situ and spaceborne assets to think globally, predict regionally, and act locally. Humanity will be both humbled and inspired when we find living microbes on Mars, alien sea-life under Europa’s ice and detect many “pale blue dots” that are Earth-like planets around other stars.
The power of genetic engineering will allow us to understand and manipulate the aging bio-clock, and to practice individualized genetic medicine. We will see a proliferation of prosthetics that both replace and extend our abilities. Humanity (or our bioengineered descendents) will then be physically able to endure the rigors of space travel.
While there will undoubtedly be government-sponsored space exploration that is in service of science and opening new frontiers, the trailing edge of economic development will provide new technologies, new jobs and new wealth. The reasons to make the trip to space will vary greatly: Some of us will be busy extracting “Sutter’s gold” from orbiting bio-tech laboratories or near-Earth object minerals; some will be developing a second home for humanity on Mars and studying the “second genesis” of life we will have found under the surface of the Red Planet.
However, I think there are even more fundamental changes coming by 2057 in our mental capabilities and relationship to the natural world. Multi-tasking, and the search, storage and manipulation of vast googolplex-sized data clouds will result in a mind-machine interface that is seamless. The barriers between the virtual world and the real world will become meaningless as we constantly move between them. We will perfect virtual experiences, create robots that pass the Turing test for artificial intelligence (producing conversation indistinguishable from that of a human control) and modify our own beings to create an integration that will make the old debates of human versus robotic space exploration meaningless.
Beyond even these changes, though, lies something more wondrous and amazing. That is the understanding and application of entanglement – Einstein’s despised “spooky action at a distance” that is nevertheless a fact of quantum mechanics. Experiments conducted since 1972 continue to demonstrate that pairs of subatomic particles and photons created through certain processes (radioactive decay, double-slit experiments) are “entangled.” It is well known that pairs created this way have opposite characteristics (opposite quantum spin, opposite optical polarity).
The spooky feature is that when one measures one particle to be, for example, spin up, even after it has traveled kilometers, the brother particle will instantly exhibit the opposite spin. It is as if either information has traveled faster than the speed of light, or there is a property of matter that transcends space-time distance as we ordinarily observe it in our (mostly Newtonian) world. Entangled particles, and even ensembles of particles, have now been used by several prominent research groups to demonstrate a form of “teleportation.”
By 2057, science will have come to grips with the phenomenon of entanglement in a variety of startling ways. We will understand the relationship of mind and matter: why the act of “human observation or measurement” results in a certain reality. In the practical world of space exploration, entanglement engineering will result in a method of sending messages and matter that evades the speed of light barrier in the macro-universe.
We now have cell phones that were only fantasy in the 1968 edition of Star Trek. Can the matter transporter be far behind by 2057? Beam me up, Scotty!
-- A former director of NASA Ames Research Center, G. Scott Hubbard holds the Carl Sagan Chair at the SETI Institute and is a visiting scholar at Stanford University.
Scott's vision is refreshing-and certainly not "more of the same."
Space Ones would do well to also look where Scott is casting his vision-particularly at the revolutionary "mind and matter" matrix that is re-defining medicine and many other fields.
The one word that will drive all in the new world in space? Energy.
Posted by: Kathleen Connell | March 15, 2007 at 10:25 PM
Man on Mars by 2019 using 3 Shuttles
To Reduce Program Costs
MODIFY THE SPACE SHUTTLES FOR A MANNED MISSION TO MARS
Before planned 2011 Retiring of the STS Fleet
Send 3 Shuttles to Mars
......by Michael J. Coppi, [email protected], 01/05/09
As a former Aerospace Engineer with the Space Transportation System, I envision that the U.S. can complete a manned Mars mission (landing/return) within ten years. Such could also be accomplished on a much lower budget (in relation to a 100% newly designed program), by using existing hardware (the 3 Space Shuttles as primary components [+ some new equipment]) and including backup systems to ensure mission success.
Here's an outline -- naturally there are details to work out, but this mission SHOULD BE viable [Orbiter Names are used arbitrarily].............
OUTLINE SYNOPSIS:
A. Discovery to Mars - Atmospheric Penetration, Landing, Return-to-Orbit Module
B. Atlantis to Mars Orbit - Docks with + Returns Excursion Crew to Earth
C. Endeavour Accompanies as Contingency Rescue - Backup of All Elements
OUTLINE SUMMARY
i). Launch into low earth orbit an unmanned vehicle carrying a spaceworthy 'CANister' [CAN] - supply of food/water/oxygen to support 3 astronauts during journey to Mars.
ii). Launch into low earth orbit an unmanned vehicle carrying a Booster Rocket Motor [BRM] for propulsion to Mars.
'CAN' and 'BRM' are 'parked' together, possibly [preferably] docked-with/tethered-to International Space Station [ISS]. See below [note c] for alternative to BRM.
1). Launch 'Discovery' from KSC pad 39A - in the cargo bay is an MEM [Mars Exit Module - designed to carry crew from Mars surface to Mars orbit upon completion of surface exploration].
MEM/Additional crew could also be pre-launched/picked-up at ISS.
2). Discovery picks up CAN/BRM/MEM/Crew as necessary. MEM must go in cargo bay, 'CAN' is attached via a hatch/airlock for access en-route [nominal length of trip to Mars = 9 months]. 'BRM' is 'strapped on' for boost to Mars + course corrections and insertion into Mars orbit.
Discovery makes a one-way trip to Mars (to be immediately followed by Atlantis for crew return - see below), where it will serve as lander (or introduction into Martian atmosphere of lander) - see further below.
3). Atlantis is launched. Minimal [2] crew. Payload [food/water/oxygen for crew of 2 to Mars + return of 5 astronauts] is pre-stowed in cargo bay and/or picked up in orbit like Discovery's 'CAN'. Also picks up a pre-launched 'BRM' [double capacity BRM = fuel to/from Mars].
Atlantis is the 'return from Mars' vehicle. Launched within days/weeks of Discovery from KSC pad 39B. Atlantis follows Discovery to Mars to receive MEM/crew upon return from Martian surface.
4). Discovery arrives/orbits Mars, jettisons CAN & BRM. Fires existing onboard OMS [Orbital Maneuvering System] pods and enters Martian atmosphere, positioned to land at smoothest possible locale.
Landing will be rough but upright and survivable. Perhaps oversized tires on retrofitted landing gear [perhaps even skis]. Early deployment of drag chute could possibly compensate for thin Martian atmosphere. See alternate landing scenario further below (MEM ejected as independent soft lander).
5). After 2-week [+/-] excursion, MEM launches directly from cargo bay, docks with Atlantis in Mars orbit (jettison after crew/sample transfer or stow in cargo bay). Utilize Atlantis' double-capacity CAN & BRM for return to Earth, de-orbit as usual, land at KSC or Edwards AFB.
6). Endeavour has been launched within a month of Discovery, and [with its own CAN/BRM/MEM + minimal crew] has followed Atlantis to serve as backup/rescue. (If unused, it can be possibly be fitted for a later Moon Sample Return Mission [MSRM]).
Why relegate retired Space Shuttles to eternity in a museum? The 3 Orbiters can be modified to serve as the backbone of a manned explorative journey of Mars - an STS Finale. Enterprise is already at the Smithsonian, the remainder of the fleet is spaceworthy, and that's exactly where the shuttles should spend their final days: IN SPACE.
by Michael J. Coppi, [email protected], 01/05/09
Notes:
a). Could be accomplished with two Shuttles [2 journey, 1 lands, 1 returns], or three [3rd as backup/rescue Mars Lander w/MEM]. Both [or all three] Orbiters coupled together in "train" configuration with powering Shuttle at rear would eliminate need for separate BRMs and Cans, plus consolidate interplanetary travel.
b). The biggest argument might be concern over Discovery's Mars landing in thin atmosphere and on uncleared ground. Prior reconnaissance can easily choose a relatively barren area with just small rocks. Possibly even "ski"-type landing gear (deployed with explosive charges) instead of wheels. Recall that landing is one-time only.
Alternately, landing crew transfers to MEM, MEM ejects from Discovery within Martian atmosphere, MEM parachutes and/or retrofires to independent soft landing, Discovery impacts unmaaned, acts as 'seeder' per addendum [further below].
c). Perhaps a Mini External Tank [MET] as 'payload' in cargo bay of Discovery upon launch from Earth. Removed from bay in earth orbit [replaced with pre-launched MEM] and attached to the Mars-bound Shuttle [similarly to ET]. Main engines would then be available [greater thrust, throttleable and re-fireable for corrections and orbit insertion]. 'MET' option would remain in Cargo Bay of Atlantis with direct feed line to Main Engines.
Copyright © 2009, Michael J. Coppi,
[email protected], 909-370-3723
From a concept originally proposed 3/15/2005 by Michael J. Coppi
163 W. La Sierra Dr.; Arcadia, CA 91007 626-447-9102
Q & A
I remain adament that this project is feasible and needs to be pursued. Concerns [such as below] are anticipated - the general answer being that any obstacles CAN be overcome. The main thing is that 70% of the equipment needed for a manned mission to Mars ALREADY EXISTS. The opportunity to utilize these resources [Shuttles + STS Launch Capability] should not be forsaken.
I urge promotion of an agenda that incorporates Space Shuttles as the primary component of a manned Mars program. I contend that such a paradigm shift is necessary to achieve this goal.
Addressing particlar queries --
Q:
>>>>>>>
Mass in LEO [Low Earth Orbit]... booster rocket motor component would have to be very large.... [plus extra] propellant to prevent boil-off. This is an Aries V-class payload.
>>>>>>>
Entry speeds... entering the atmosphere from hyperbolic speeds... [shuttles' tiles] could not take the additional heat load.
>>>>>>
Shuttles landing on Mars... at 100,000 feet (the place where Earth's atmosphere is as thin as it is on Mars' surface), the shuttle is going much faster. Landing would be difficult, and deploying the drag chute would not help.
>>>>>>>
Power... fuel cells... deployable solar power system... batteries.
>>>>
Timeline Cost/Manpower... space shuttle [operations] costs $3B/year... not be able to 'switch' to development
<<<<<<<
A:
All the more reason to GO with this program NOW, and especially before the ops force dissipates and/or systems capability is modified [Orion] or lost completely [SRB construction, ET construction, etc.]. New engineering must be contracted.
- Mike Coppi, BSAE, Cal Poly Pomona, 1982
.......................
Addendum --
Seed Mars Now!
.........by Michael J. Coppi, [email protected], 01/05/09
We must begin now to prepare Mars for future colonization by Humans.
The 'search for life' program is now anticlimactic at best, moot at worst. It almost seems a waste to keep sending sterile launders. In fact the uncertainty that all landers have been 100% sterile puts in question the source of any "life" ever found. Remember too that meteorites from Earth may have already seeded Mars in the distant or recent past..
Future probes should be deliberately "contaminated" with any and all organisms that have the slightest chance of surviving and taking root in the Martian environment.
Life forms accustomed to Arctic/Antarctic locales are obvious prime choices.
The simplest method of delivery would be to shield the probe for entry into the Martian atmosphere, then allow it to crash to the surface.
More sophisticated soft landers could even provide nourishment and/or shelter for moss, grass, microbes, even insects.
There's certainly CO2 in the atmosphere to possibly support some hardy polar algae, moss or plant from Earth that can survive with just the moisture from ice that's been found just beneath the Martian surface. Eventually leading to simple grasses. More plants = O2 added to atmosphere for eventual animal life.
Terra-Forming efforts must start now!
by Michael J. Coppi, [email protected], 01/05/09
800 E. Washington St. #833
Colton, CA 92324
909-370-3723
-------------------
Posted by: Michael J. Coppi | July 18, 2009 at 11:12 AM
Each day brings with it new frontiers, in our homes and in our business, if we only recognize them. We are just at the beginning of the progress in every field of human endeavor.
Posted by: coach wallets | June 29, 2010 at 02:54 AM
nothing in the world is impossible if you set your mind to do it.
Posted by: lacoste shoes 2010 | July 06, 2010 at 03:08 AM
A friendship founded on bussiness is better than business founded on friendship. Do you understand?
Posted by: lacoste shoes | July 22, 2010 at 08:46 PM
these are times with more liberty,but less joy; we have much more food,but less nutrition;who could told me why?
Posted by: discount coach | July 27, 2010 at 09:04 PM
This can be absolutely just one for this more effective blogs I've view. You are so insightful, have a lot genuine stuff to provide towards table.
Posted by: Puma Shoes | August 03, 2010 at 09:49 PM
Many people have reported seeing portals opening in cloudy skies - strange swirling lights sometimes accompanied by sounds - temporal distortions - electromagnetic distortions called 'electronic fog' that can cause a time storm, and the disappearance of planes and ships. There is something about this fog that is important and gives one the sense of all things paranormal.
Posted by: buy viagra | August 05, 2010 at 11:38 AM
This is very cute. I think that I am going to give it a try. thanks
Posted by: Asics shoes | October 28, 2010 at 04:23 AM
The spooky feature is that when one measures one particle to be
Posted by: supra shoes | January 06, 2011 at 05:53 AM
Remember too that meteorites from Earth may have already seeded Mars in the distant or recent past..
Posted by: vibram five fingers | March 30, 2011 at 10:55 PM
The simplest method of delivery would be to shield the probe for entry into the Martian atmosphere, then allow it to crash to the surface.
Posted by: ecco shoes | April 07, 2011 at 06:36 AM
Some of this change will be attitudinal. We will invest heavily in stewardship of this planet as climate changes.
Posted by: vibram five fingers | May 26, 2011 at 06:42 AM