« POGO Blasts Contractors | Main | Swiss Choppers Lift Off »

May 24, 2007

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b88369e200d83547b72f53ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Less Lethal Still Hurts:

Comments

Mike Harbour

Michael:

Good post; BTW, I'm glad you, at least, got the non- versus less-lethal nomenclature figured out. Your ARES peers for weeks have been using the phrase "nonlethal" when, IMHO, "less lethal" is more appropriate. While the acoustic weapon used on David Axe probably falls under the non-lethal category, I'd think any device using electricity is best classified as less lethal.

Mike Harbour
Freelance writer

Sean Meade

well, for that matter, Mike, less-lethal doesn't make a whole lot of sense, technically speaking. lethal is a binary adjective. something's either lethal or it's not. guess we could go with 'potentially lethal' or 'not necessarily lethal'...

The comments to this entry are closed.

Current Issue

Blog powered by Typepad

Ares Photos

  • Riot 1
    Check out exclusive photos from Defense Technology International for a preview of upcoming stories, including: * Australian Army equips for stability ops * Army upgrades paratroopers * New A-10s!